Forests and Prairies Division Update

The foresters and I have had a great summer doing prairie work.

Additional training opportunities and more direct work with landowners with

prairie and woods has made for a smooth combination in land management

advice to private landowners. I've heard stories from several foresters

about discovering or protecting prairie remnants and the potential for

savanna restoration seems to be popping up across the state. We're also

considering how best to utilize and manage the prairie remnants with the

State Forest Areas. We've made a quiet and steady entry into the prairie

scene - subtle, a little like the prairie itself.

During this past summer we received extra on-site information from Dan

Allan of Allendan Seeds, Howard Bright of Ion Exchange, and the staff from

Effigy Mounds (savanna restoration efforts). About a fourth of the F&P

staff attended the NAPC in July - a great mixing of prairie folks with

foresters that was much appreciated. Inta- and inter- agency discussions

about fire training needs and opportunities have progressed since last

November's first Fire Discussion. These particular interactions affirmed

our directions initially set for not producing prairie seed for private

lands; for doing prairie work beyond just wildlife habitat plantings; and

for identifying the extent of fire training needed and serve in a

coordinating role to meet those needs statewide.

The State Fair brought us a chance to invite people to learn more about

prairie at the IDNR building - special thanks to CIPN members Cindy

Hildebrand, Joyce Hornstein, and Rich Pope for doing courtyard presentations

for curious visitors. They were wonderful!

The F&P Division is undergoing strategic planning. Prairie is an

integral part of all the planning to date. If you want to discuss prairie

services you'd like to see us consider, please feel free to contact me at

jceells@ncn.net or call me at 515-832-1771.

 

Jean Eells, Prairie Specialist, IDNR Forests and Prairies Division

2550 Stagecoach Road

Webster City, IA 50595-7375

515-832-1771

 

IPN's ANNUAL MEETING

by Glenda Buenger

 

     IPN's Annual Meeting was held Tuesday evening, July 18 during NAPC's

barbecue supper. An almost palpable feeling of cohesion and joy filled the

room

as "Prairie Potpourri," consisting of David Zahrt on bass fiddle, and Carl

Kurtz

and Mollie McGovern on guitars, played a number of prairie songs for us, with

word sheets so that we could sing together. Roger Maddux provided a special

addition with his recorder on "Iowa Waltz."

     IPN President Casey Kohrt gave a short speech using the analogy of a seed

to describe IPN's germination and growth, tying in the conference's theme,

"Seeds for the Future, Roots of the Past" and IPN's goals to "learn about,

teach

about, enjoy and protect Iowa's prairie heritage." We honored IPN's founders

as

part of our 10th birthday celebration. These people - Dianne Blankenship, Joel

Hanes, Pauline Drobney, Mary Norton, Glenn Pollock, Cindy Hildebrand, Joyce

Hornstein, Trish Patrick, Gene Kromray, and Phyllis Kiburz - had not sat

together at the same table since their last meeting as Regional

Representatives,

and it was an honor to have them all together again. Each was presented a

hardback copy of Aldo Leopold's A Sand County Almanac in appreciation of their

work to create and sustain IPN. Cindy Hildebrand and Pauline Drobney gave

short

speeches on behalf of the honorees, with reminisces by Joel Hanes and Gene

Kromray, and a personal thank-you from Glenn Pollock, who served as President

for a number of years after IPN was formed. Carol Schutte was also presented a

copy of Sand County and received a standing ovation in appreciation for all

her

work to organize and orchestrate a very successful NAPC conference.

     The present Board inaugurated a new event at this year's Annual Meeting:

recognition of Prairie Mothers (or Prairie Fathers, or Prairie Grandpas,

etc.).

Many of us have a Prairie Mother (or Prairie Father, etc.) - that someone who

"turned us on" to prairie, or who was or is very important to us by nurturing

our own passion and involvement with prairie. Such people provide personal

inspiration and support and, knowingly or unknowingly, a role model for us to

emulate in inspiring and helping others in our turn. They are crucial in

sustaining IPN as a truly grassroots organization, and we wish to publicly

recognize their important contributions. We proudly inaugurated the "Prairie

Mother" award by honoring Region 6 member Martha Skillman. Martha is an

indefatigable networker, encourager, positive energizer and people

skill-builder. The award was especially gratifying because if you know Martha,

you know that she is a well-spoken person seldom at a loss for words, and we

caught her, literally, speechless. Martha received a standing ovation.

Congratulations, Martha!

     Any IPN member may nominate a Prairie Mother or Prairie Father to be

recognized at future Annual Meetings, so please be thinking if there is

someone

you'd like publicly honored and watch next year for our Annual Meeting

information.

     By this time some 75 folks had assembled to share the wonderful ambience

of

our meeting and honor IPN's founders! We sang the birthday song and made sure

to

take pictures, then enjoyed birthday cake as we started the business end of

the

meeting:  Don Bardole (Region 7) and Pam White (Region 6) were formally

elected

to the Board.

     Casey presented an amendment to Article V, Section 2 of IPN's by-laws,

proposing to expand the Board from 14 to 20 members. IPN's advocacy for

prairies

is being recognized. IPN is increasingly asked for assistance with projects

that

benefit prairies, and we need more Board members to share the workload. Four

Board positions are vacant and have been so for some time.

   Discussion, questions, and explanations regarding rationale for IPN's dual

structure: activities work better when organized by region, but IPN's

interests

encompass statewide issues; what might be done to help activate weak regions

and

thus gain Board members from those regions, etc. Joel Hanes explained that two

Board members per each of seven regions was devised so as to avoid IPN being

dominated by one region. Trish Patrick pointed out that at-large Board members

could help with the work of representing IPN's statewide interests; vacant

regional Board positions could remain vacant so as not to be filled by someone

not from that region.

     Judith Felder moved, Trish Patrick seconded to approve the amendment to

add

6 at-large Board positions. Further discussion concerning compliance with

by-laws. "Shall" and "will" language in by-laws is troublesome when we can't

fill Board positions. Casey offers friendly amendment to Judith's motion,

substituting "up to" in the language so that it is easier for IPN to comply

with

by-laws. Friendly amendment accepted by Judith and Trish. Membership approves

proposed amendment with Casey's suggested language change.

     Article V, Board of Directors, Section 2, Tenure and Qualification

presently states "The Board of Directors of the organization shall consist of

fourteen (14) members, which is two (2) members per each of seven (7) regions

in

Iowa." The approved amendment changes this to: "The Board of Directors of the

organization shall consist of up to twenty (20) members, which is two members

per each of seven (7) regions in Iowa, and up to six (6) at-large members."

     Cindy moves, Glenda Buenger seconds that the position of Newsletter

Editor

be made a Board member with Board (voting) privileges. Membership approves.

Cindy nominates, Chad Graeve seconds Jon Judson, who accepts the nomination to

the Board. Membership approves Jon Judson as an at-large Board member. Bruce

Ehresman nominates, Chad seconds Kevin Pape, who accepts the nomination to the

Board. Membership approves Kevin Pape as Board member representing Region 1,

NW

Iowa.  Membership approves Kirk Larsen as Board member representing Region 3,

NE

Iowa.

     Glenn Pollock makes motion to adjourn; meeting adjourned. Meeting to

reconvene after "Walt Whitman" event so that new Board can elect officers,

membership invited.

 

USDA/PRAIRIES DISCUSSION AT THE NORTH AMERICAN PRAIRIE CONFERENCE -- Part One

by Cindy Hildebrand

 

     The July NAPC included a facilitated discussion on USDA conservation

programs and prairies, sponsored by the IPN. Special thanks are due to the

participants from Congressional offices and public agencies, to facilitator

Margo Underwood, and to NAPC organizer Carol Schutte, for making the

discussion

possible.

     Because the discussion was national in scope, it dealt with many prairie

issues. It should be noted that the following background sheet, distributed at

the discussion, reflects that national perspective, and that not all the

problems are significant in Iowa.

     It was generally agreed at the discussion that the language and funding

of

the next Farm Bill will be critical for U.S. prairies. Those who would like to

join a national prairie listserve that includes discussions of USDA/prairie

issues can contact Cindy at grantridge@aol.com.

     Part Two, in the next IPN NEWS, will provide more information on the

discussion, on USDA prairie issues, and on the forthcoming Farm Bill.

 

USDA CONSERVATION PROGRAMS AND PRAIRIES: Ecological, Financial, and Regulatory

Challenges

by Cindy Hildebrand

 

     Background Information -- The problems below are not universal, but are

being reported from various states in the prairie region. Solutions might

potentially be found on the federal, regional, state, or local levels, and

could

involve changes in laws, rules, funding levels, programs, or policies.

     Some Prairie Problems

     Landowners are plowing up native prairie areas and planting them to

rowcrops in order to qualify for the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). In

some

cases, landowners are reportedly putting cropland into CRP, and then plowing

native prairie to put into rowcrops.

     There is a federal requirement that woody species be planted on marginal

riparian pastures enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program. This

requirement

is causing the destruction of native prairie remnants and is creating

unnecessary costs for landowners and agencies. In addition, the planting of

woody vegetation along some creeks may pose a potential threat to a

federally-endangered fish species (the Topeka Shiner).

     On some CRP land, invasive exotic plant species are being planted,

including exotics that invade native prairie areas. Some agency staff have not

had opportunities to learn which species are native, and are recommending that

non-native species be used in native plantings.

     There is concern that the planting of commercial prairie cultivars near

native prairie remnants, and near source-identified prairie nursery plantings,

may cause the genetic contamination of those remnants and plantings. Diseases

have also been introduced into new areas by certain cultivars. Some USDA

program

participants want to plant local-origin prairie seed. But some program

requirements make local-origin plantings difficult, including high grass/forb

seed ratios, all-at-once planting requirements, and lack of incentives and

program flexibility. In addition, some agency staff members and landowners are

not being informed that seed origin is an issue to consider.

     Some programs require that money be spent in ways that provide little

public benefit. That money could potentially be used instead for prairie

conservation and better plantings. For example, fertilizer has been required

for

native plantings on sites where the fertilizer helped weeds and discouraged

natives, and new plantings have been required on already-vegetated areas where

soil conservation, water quality, and wildlife habitat already existed.

     State and local USDA staff have had to follow federal rules that are not

flexible enough to fit local landscapes, including prairie landscapes. Local

staff sometimes don't have time or opportunity to learn about prairies,

evaluate

planting sites with prairie remnants, or to become familiar with program rules

that could help protect prairie remnants and encourage good prairie plantings.

      Native prairie, especially tallgrass prairie, is a globally endangered

landscape. It provides public benefits, including water quality protection,

soil

conservation, biodiversity, wildlife habitat, and carbon storage. But while

there are incentive programs within the USDA to protect wetlands, there is no

incentive program to protect native prairies or to offset the financial

incentive to convert native prairie to CRP. This problem could also be an

opportunity.

 

IPN BOARD MEETING MINUTES

 

     (These notes are brief reports on a long meeting. Please contact your

Board

members if an issue interests you.)

     The IPN Board met Sept. 9, 2000, at the IDNR State Nursery, Ames.

Present:

Dave Hansen, Sue Irving, Jim Nedtwig, Pam White, Glenn Pollock, Don Bardole,

Casey Kohrt, Kevin Pape, Kirk Larsen , Jon Judson, Trish Patrick, Laura

Norian.

     Laura took notes, and will serve as temporary secretary until a permanent

IPN secretary can be found.

     Money raised at the IPN Silent Auction at the NAPC will be rounded up to

$3500 and donated to the Iowa Chapter of The Nature Conservancy to help

protect

the Lineberry Tract in the Loess Hills.

     The IPN will send $500 to Loren Lown to help pay for booklets on prairie

reconstruction. The Board will get booklets for distribution.

     The IPN web page is progressing slowly. More IPN stationary will be

printed. The cost of membership lapel pins will be investigated. More

teeshirts

may be printed. A traveling IPN exhibit is needed.

     Jon is working on CRP and Farm Bill issues that sometimes adversely

affect

prairies. Jon was appointed as the official IPN representative for Senator

Harkin's proposed farm conservation bill.

     Jim is working on a prairie economics study with the donated help of a

(generous) economist at ISU. The study will provide useful data to present to

policy-makers.

     Discussions took place regarding Loess Hills fill dirt mining, the

implications of carbon storage credits for prairies, Glenn's prairie

cemeteries

tour, protection options for landowners, controlled burning and grazing

issues,

cedar harvest for profit and prairie improvement, public education regarding

prairies and prairie events, and local-ecotype prairie seed issues.

     The next meeting is tentatively set for January 13th. All IPN members are

welcome to attend.

 

IOWA ECOTYPE ARTICLE AVAILABLE

 By Cindy Hildebrand

 

     The July/August 2000 issue of the IOWA CONSERVATIONIST carried an

interesting article about the Iowa Ecotype Project called "Consider the

Source,"

by Greg Houseal. The article discusses general prairie seed genetic issues.

Copies of that issue are still available. If you would like one, please

contact

Editor Julie Sparks at Julie.Sparks@dnr.state.ia.us or at 515-281-6159.

Thanks,

Julie!

 

PRAIRIE GUIDE

By Karie Wiltshire

 

     Working to enhance the familiarity of Grinnell-area residents and

visitors

with prairie in the region, The Center for Prairie Studies at Grinnell College

compiled a brochure, "Guide to Prairie Sites Near Grinnell, Iowa." The

brochure

offers directions, descriptions, and contact information for 47 prairie

reconstructions and remnants, both publicly owned and unmanaged, within a

50-mile radius of the city. For more information, or to obtain brochures,

contact the Center at 641-269-4720 or e-mail prairie@grinnell.edu.

 

 

Iowa Prairie Network Survey

 

     The Iowa Prairie Network is conducting this survey to help determine the

economic impact, nature, and extent of prairie related projects carried out by

individual Iowans. Please complete this survey only if your prairie lives in

the

state of Iowa. Thank you for your participation.

 

                                                                                    Your Name

 

 

Part A: Prairie reconstructions and Restorations

How many total acres of prairie have you reconstructed or restored?

 

 

 

About what percentage of the seed you use for reconstructions or restorations

do

you collect on your own (i.e. what percentage do you not pay money for)?

 

 

 

 

 

About how many species of prairie plants do you include in each reconstruction

or restoration?

 

 

 

How many hours do you spend collecting prairie seed, per acre of

reconstruction

or restoration?

 

 

 

What are your average, annual, out of pocket expenses per acre, during the

first

two years of

prairie establishment (include any prairie related expenses such as books,

conferences, weeding, herbicide, purchase of seed, gas, etc.)?

 

 

 

What are your average, annual, out of pocket expenses per acre, after the

first

two years of

prairie establishment?

 

 

Do you use local ecotype seed (75 mile radius)?

 

 

 

From whom do you purchase seed?

 

 

 

 

Part B: Virgin Prairie

How many acres of virgin prairie land do you, as an individual, manage?

 

 

 

What are your average, annual out of pocket expenses per